May 5, 2026

Welcome

Enterprise Roundtable on

Interim Reliefs

Hosted by SAMA

Suljhao, Magar Pyaar Se

Let's Get Started

Warm Up

30 seconds each — let's go around the room

1
Your Name
2
Your Organisation
3
Your Favourite Song 🎵

Keep it to 30 seconds — we have a packed agenda!

SAMA

( S I N C E   2 0 1 5 )

India's First Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Platform

Out of Court + Fully Online = Online Dispute Resolution (ODR)

Empanelled with Bombay High Court as a mediation institution

Trusted by 75+ Corporates, 8+ State Govts, SEBI, Police

2 Cr+
Cases Filed
50L+
Cases Resolved
400+
Cities
3,800+
Neutrals

Suljhao, Magar Pyaar Se

As seen on Shark Tank India
Enterprise Roundtable · May 5, 2026

Interim Reliefs:
The Key to Faster Settlements

Strengthening Interim Orders for Lenders

Bringing people to the table is half the battle won.

The real problem in Indian mediation isn't failed mediation. It's mediation that never begins.

When a respondent evades, the claimant shouldn't be left waiting. Interim reliefs aren't about winning — they're rooted in equity, protecting the integrity of the process itself.

Post-interim relief, non-starters often become active parties. Cases that seemed stuck, settle. Med-Arb isn't a fallback — it's a design choice.

Dedicated mediation windows within arbitration. Procedural fairness intact. A cautious, case-by-case approach — never blanket.

The goal was never arbitration vs mediation.
The goal is settlement. With dignity.

IO in Action

Personal Loan Default

IO led to full settlement in 120 days

A leading private sector bank disbursed a personal loan of ₹4.2 lakhs to a salaried borrower. The borrower defaulted after 4 EMIs, stopped responding to collection calls, and the account turned NPA.

Traditional recovery efforts — notices, calls, field visits — had been ongoing for 5 months with zero response.

The bank filed for arbitration through Sama and applied for an interim order seeking a debit freeze on the borrower's accounts.

₹4.2L
Outstanding
5 mo
No Response
NPA
Account Status
How the IO Was Granted

The 3 Requirements — Met

The Sama Process

From Filing to Settlement

Day 1

Bank shared case details with Sama

Day 2–16

Pre-arbitration notice sent to borrower

Day 16–23

Arbitrator appointed

Day 24–45

Pleadings filed and exchanged

Day 45

Interim Order issued — debit freeze up to ₹4.2L

Day 45–75

Order communicated to banks, lien marking completed

Day 75–90

Borrower called the bank — first contact in 5 months. Contacts Sama case manager, requests settlement assistance.

Day 90–120

Settlement finalised at a 15% waiver on the outstanding amount

Industry Data Across Multiple Lenders

What the Numbers Show

Across 20,000+ interim orders issued via Sama
₹310 Cr
Actual Recovery
2.4x recovery growth YoY
20,000+
Interim Orders Issued
27 days
Avg. Arbitrator Appointment to IO
Top 5 States
Maharashtra Andhra Pradesh Gujarat Karnataka New Delhi
Common Types of Reliefs
Account Freezing Salary Attachment Repossession of Vehicles Sale of Vehicles Asset Preservation

Compare — Traditional Route:
DRT / Civil Suit: 12–18 months, with uncertain recovery

"The borrower who ghosted for 5 months called within 8 days of the freeze."

Interim orders change the incentive structure overnight.

Legal Opinion by Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas

Interim Reliefs:

The Key to Faster Settlements

The 2015 Amendment to the Arbitration Act gave arbitral tribunals the power to grant interim orders with the same enforceability as court decrees. Yet institutional adoption remains limited — held back by legal hesitation, compliance barriers, and persistent misconceptions.

Three questions come up again and again. A formal legal opinion addresses each one.

Q1
Do IOs need court confirmation?
Q2
Can they bind third-party banks?
Q3
Can you freeze via PAN?
1

Do Section 17 orders need court confirmation?

⚖️
NO.

They are deemed to be orders of the Court and enforceable under CPC — no separate court validation needed.

2

Are these orders binding on third-party banks?

🏦
YES, with nuance.

Orders securing a respondent's assets held with third-party banks are valid and must be complied with once duly communicated.

The Key Distinction (Delhi HC — Gatx India v. Arshiya)

✅ PERMITTED

Orders that incidentally affect third parties (e.g., freeze on respondent's account held with a bank)

⚠️ CAUTION

Orders granting relief directly against third parties' own assets

3

Can accounts be frozen based on PAN alone?

🔐
YES, in exceptional cases.

Where specific account details are unavailable despite best efforts, PAN and KYC particulars can be used.

Enterprise Roundtable · May 5, 2026

Practitioner Panel

3 Questions · 3 Practitioners · 5 Minutes Each

G
Govindrajan Sir
Former GC, IndusInd Bank
Q1 · Legality & Clause Structure
S
Sundar Sir
Senior Litigator, Chennai
Q2 · Spectrum of Interim Reliefs
A
Arif Sir
Retd. District Judge, Rajasthan
Q3 · Enforceability from the Bench
S
Moderated by Srishti
Head of Business & Ops, Sama

Followed by 25-minute Open Forum

1
Govindrajan Sir · Former GC, IndusInd Bank

Is account freezing through Section 17 legally sound? And can lenders with unilateral arbitration clauses still invoke it?

Key Points

Account freezing under Section 17 is fully legal and has been judicially affirmed

Post-2015 Amendment, Section 17 orders are deemed orders of the Court — enforceable under CPC

Even where the underlying clause is unilateral, lenders can still invoke Section 17

The unilateral nature does not strip the tribunal of its powers under the Act

Ideal hygiene going forward: move toward institutional ODR clauses in loan agreements

ODR clauses sidestep the unilateral issue entirely and offer cleaner enforceability

"The law is settled. The question is institutional willingness — and clause hygiene."

2
Sundar Sir · Senior Litigator, Chennai

Beyond account freezing, what other interim reliefs can lenders seek under Section 17?

The Full Toolkit

Freezing of specific bank accounts

Most common

Injunction on immovable property

Repossession of movable assets

Repossession of vehicles

Used by IndusInd, Kotak Prime

Sale of vehicles (post-repossession, prior to or during arbitration)

Injunction on utilisation of salary (with direction to communicate to employer)

Debit order for frozen amounts (subject to bank undertaking)

Garnishee Orders / Attachment of receivables

"The choice depends on the facts — freezes for liquid funds, preservation for secured lending, disclosure when the borrower goes dark."

3
Arif Sir · Retd. District Judge, Rajasthan

How enforceable are Section 17 orders in practice? Must banks comply directly, or does the lender need a separate court order?

Key Points

Once a Section 17 order is duly communicated, the bank should comply directly

No need to approach a court for a separate enforcement order

Supreme Court in Alka Chandewar: Section 17 orders are deemed orders of the Court

Karnataka HC in Ramya Malini v. Canara Bank: banks ought to comply once communicated

Non-compliance attracts contempt proceedings under Section 27(5) of the Act

Enforcement should be straightforward — the law treats these as court orders in every sense

"The judicial position is settled. Communication is the key — once communicated, compliance is expected."

25 Minutes

Open Forum

J
Moderated by Jishnu
Head of Sales, Sama
Suggested Prompts
1

Any questions for the practitioner panel?

2

Your biggest concern around interim reliefs?

3

What will it take for all branches to standardise and accept interim reliefs?

4

In what situations should an interim relief not be granted?

Before We Close

Surveys

Let's get a pulse of the room.

Your Leave-Behind

Interim Order Adoption Kit

Everything your team needs to make the internal case.

QR Code
📱
QR Code
Scan on screen
⚖️

Legal Opinion from Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas

📋

Types of Interim Reliefs — full spectrum guide

Common FAQs on interim orders

📄

Anonymised case studies

IO Application Checklist — the 3 requirements

📁 Access the IO Adoption Kit — tap or scan the QR code
What Happens Next

Interested to Explore More?

Today was the starting point. Here's how we take this forward.

🤝

1:1 Session with Your Team

Sama will schedule a tailored deep-dive with your Legal, Risk, and Collections teams:

Map interim relief use-cases to your specific portfolio and loan products

Walk through the Sama process end-to-end — filing, IO issuance, enforcement

Address your institution-specific concerns — clause structure, compliance, regulatory

Explore a pilot program — controlled deployment with measurable outcomes

Speak to any Sama team member here today, or write to pranjal@sama.live

Our Core Intent

Bringing People to the Table
is Half the Battle Won

The real problem in Indian mediation isn't failed mediation. It's mediation that never begins.

When a respondent evades, the claimant shouldn't be left waiting. Interim reliefs aren't about winning — they're rooted in equity, protecting the integrity of the process itself.

Post-interim relief, non-starters often become active parties. Cases that seemed stuck, settle. Med-Arb isn't a fallback — it's a design choice.

Dedicated mediation windows within arbitration. Procedural fairness intact. A cautious, case-by-case approach — never blanket.

The goal was never arbitration vs mediation.
The goal is settlement. With dignity.

📸

Group Photo Time!

And then — High Tea awaits.

Sama team is available during high tea for 1:1 conversations — institution-specific questions, pilot discussions, or just getting to know each other better.

Thank you for being here.

pranjal@sama.live · www.sama.live

1 / 22